Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 01:58

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Chicago Bears offense has 94-yard TD drive in 2 minute drill at minicamp - Windy City Gridiron
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Mars isn’t Red? The Planet is Actually… - The Daily Galaxy
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Zoning Out or Zoning In? How Aimless Wandering Trains the Brain - Neuroscience News
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Elon Musk’s Neuralink closes a $650M Series E - TechCrunch
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Thank you.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Brain-region stimulation may ease motor symptoms, study finds - Parkinson's News Today
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.